When objectively comparing the General Theory of Evolution with creation science concepts, it's easy to see that modern living pterodactyls fit better with creationism than with standard macro-evolution. Of course, a philosophy can explain away just about any scientific evidence; but why do I mention philosophy? The most popular part of Darwin's ideas closely relate to his basic philosophy: life on earth has no divine purpose but came into being naturally, evolving by natural processes. Darwin's scientific explanation for evolution has

long ago been proven incorrect; original Darwinism, however, did not die early in

the 20th Century, when his explanation for biological evolution was shown to be incorrect. Darwin's philosophy was too popular, so neo-Darwinism (mutational change) replaced the original Darwinism.